A survey that historically has guided blue crab management in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries shows the population has dipped by nearly 32% but likely not enough to trigger new restrictions on this season’s harvest.

The annual winter dredge survey, released May 20, suggests that the crustacean’s numbers remain “healthy and robust,” despite the downturn, said Steven Bowman, head of the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, which oversees the state’s fishing regulations.

Blue crabs during winter survey

Crabs dredged from the Chesapeake Bay’s bottom during the annual winter survey await measuring and weighing before being tossed back overboard.

“We don’t expect this will change our 2020 management measures for blue crab, and we will continue to manage blue crabs based on the best available science,” he added.

Officials in Maryland also emphasized the population’s resilience in their remarks on the report, but they stopped short of indicating how it might influence their management decisions.

The dredge survey results suggest that crabs should be available in their “normal capacity,” said Genine McClair, blue crab program manager for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. The department conducts the survey jointly with the Virginia Institute of Marine Science.

“We’re in a place where we want to be,” McClair said. The overall population of 405 million was near the average number of crabs counted during the survey’s 30-year run.

Biologists use dredge equipment to capture crabs at 1,500 sites throughout the Chesapeake Bay from December through March. They were just able to complete their work before the lockdowns began in late March, McClair said.

By every significant measure, this year’s numbers pale compared with last year’s study. But most were still above the level that scientists consider safe to sustain the population.

Juvenile blue crab

The annual winter blue crab survey in the Chesapeake Bay guides crab management in the Bay and its tributaries.

For example, adult females, a key indicator of future reproductive capacity, fell by more than a quarter to 140 million. That is below the 215 million target set by scientists but still twice the minimum safe total of 70 million.

The female population has been above that threshold for nine of the last 10 years, a sign that the species’ spawning pool is not in the danger zone, officials say.

Much of this year’s decrease was because of a drop in this year’s “juvenile” class, which was down 43%. “That doesn’t sound good for this fall and next spring,” when the newcomers will finally grow large enough to harvest, said Billy Rice, a waterman from Charles County, MD.

Regulators and environmentalists attribute the crab’s overall rebound to measures implemented in Maryland and Virginia waters after the U.S. Department of Commerce declared the fishery a disaster in 2008. 

Reactions to the survey, from environmentalists to watermen, appeared upbeat when contrasted against this season’s turmoil.

Chart: Blue crab abundance

(MD Department of Natural Resources)

Massive, state-enacted lockdowns shuttered restaurants to slow the spread of the coronavirus just days before the April 1 opening of the season. Poor weather sidelined watermen for much the first month, and a shortage of temporary foreign work visas has left many crab processors shorthanded.

Still, demand for crabs has skyrocketed in recent weeks at seafood markets, grocery stores and restaurants offering carryout service, industry leaders said. Meanwhile, the harvest continues to trend behind where it was at the same time last year.

The combination of low supply and high demand has created a “price war,” said Jason Ruth, owner of Harris Seafood Co. in Grasonville, MD. He estimates that the prices paid at the dock — which jumped from $200 to $220 per bushel between May 19 and May 20, according to industry sources — are 60% higher than at any point in the company’s history.

Before the pandemic-induced restrictions, restaurants accounted for nearly three-quarters of his sales, Ruth said. But that has been offset by a rise in people buying whole crabs off the shelf and going through the painstaking process of steaming them at home.

“One of the precursors to having crabs at home is you have to have a lot of time. Well, people have a lot more time right now,” Ruth said.

Robert Newberry, executive director of the Delmarva Fisheries Association, was flabbergasted by the going rate of a bushel.

“Do you believe that?” he asked. “I can’t believe it. I’ve never seen crab prices this high in my life — ever. If they’re $200 coming off the boat, they need a Brinks truck to be delivering these crabs.”

Chart: Female blue crabs

(MD Department of Natural Resources)

The high prices have put processors in even more of a pinch, Newberry said, because they can’t sell the meat they pick to consumers for as much as it costs for them to buy the crabs from watermen.

Watermen in Virginia and Maryland say crabs have been spotty but not that plentiful this spring, which they blame on chilly, windy weather that’s hung on through April into May.

“From what I generally see, this is probably the worst year I’ve had in 15–20 years,” said J.C. Hudgins, president of the Virginia Waterman’s Association. Hudgins said some watermen had brief success harvesting crabs in a couple spots near the mouths of the Rappahannock and York rivers, but otherwise the catch has been poor.

But what he has been able to catch has brought “exceptionally good” prices from the seafood businesses selling live or steamed crabs. Hudgins said female crabs have been going for $90 to $100 per bushel dockside, where last year they sold for only about $25 a bushel. 

Watermen say they don’t expect the high prices to persist through the season. As the weather warms this summer, crabs will become more active and start filling watermen’s pots in bigger numbers.

Note: This story has been updated to clarify that the crab population survey showed a decrease of approximately 32%.

Tags

(2) comments

EdInFlorida

This survey is flawed . Crabs are migratory and there is no giant fence on the chesapeake bay that keeps crabs from leaving . They have caught tagged crabs here in Florida out of the bay . It would also depend on the coldness of the water . On a mild winter the crabs might just go deeper and not bury up . The pricing problem is because of lack of competition on the water and over regulation

Gerald Winegrad

After digesting the most recent alarming data in the 2020 annual Blue Crab Winter Dredge survey, I was appalled to read the story by Jeremy and Tim of May 20, CHESAPEAKE CRAB POPULATION SHOWS RESILIENCY JUST IN TIME FOR ‘PRICE WAR’. This caption and article seemed like it was written by the communications folks at MD and VA DNR. The headline should have read CRAB POPULATION DROPS 32%; FEMALE NUMBERS DOWN TO ONLY TWO-THIRDS OF GOAL.

The DNR’s of MD and VA are putting lipstick on a pig and the Bay Journal is helping them. The PR idea here is to spin declines, cherry pick any straw that shows all is well, please their governors, and show how well they are managing living resources and touting how well the Bay restoration is working. The DNR’s do press releases touting any increases without fail; and every time without fail, when the numbers are down, the same folks—sometimes with scientists chiming in—try to blame declines on the weather--too hot, too cold, too wet, too dry.

This has been occurring for decades and as journalism declines, reporters just mimic the agencies or Governors. Of course, this was a very mild winter so bitter cold could not be blamed on the substantial declined in crab survey numbers. This time the spin you bought into was that the survey documents that crab populations are “healthy and robust,” the population is resilient, “We’re in a place where we want to be,”

Really? Let’s look at the hard data which is available at: https://dnr.maryland.gov/fisheries/Pages/blue-crab/dredge.aspx

*Total crab numbers dropped from 594 million to 405 million, a drop of 32% and by comparison, in 1990, the first year of the Bay winter dredge survey, a drop to only 18% of the 1990 population of 791 million. The 2020 numbers were not in line with the 30-year average but below it despite the article’s quote from Genine McClair.

*Female crabs dropped from 191 million to 141 million, a drop of 26. This was 66% below the 215 million target level.

*Juvenile Crabs dropped from more than 320 million in 2019 to less than 190 million and this key indicator dropped well below the 30-year average. In 1990 the numbers were at about 480 million juvenile crabs.

* The density of crabs declined from 61.68 per 1,000 sq. meters to 41.39, a 33% decline almost perfectly in line with the overall 32% population drop. The density of crabs was 82.16 in 1990, meaning the 2020 numbers were on-half of 30 years ago.

* The density of mature female crabs declined from 17.01 per 1,000 sq. meters to 12.75, a 25% decline almost perfectly in line with the overall 26% female population drop.

I am not a fisheries scientist but an attorney and one who dealt with translating such data into policy for 16 years in the legislature. This sure looks really bad for blue crabs. The worst aspect of such sugar-coating bad news is that it creates a sense of public ambivalence about crab populations and thus gives the governors and DNR’s cover to allow the status quo to continue under a veil of sound fishery management.

I really do expect better from the Bay Journal, especially in the age of Trump and his fake news attacks against the press

Welcome to the discussion.

We aim to provide a forum for fair and open dialogue.
Please use language that is accurate and respectful.
Comments may not include:

* Insults, verbal attacks or degrading statements
* Explicit or vulgar language
* Information that violates a person's right to privacy
* Advertising or solicitations
* Misrepresentation of your identity or affiliation
* Incorrect, fraudulent or misleading content
* Spam or comments that do not pertain to the posted article
We reserve the right to edit or decline comments that do follow these guidelines.