Kathy Blake of Hoopersville, MD

“I stopped being emotionally attached here after [Hurricane] Isabel, we lost so much,” said Kathy Blake, who lives in Hoopersville, MD. Even now, her treasured pictures are leaned up against the walls “so I can throw ‘em in a box quick if I have to get out” in the event of a higher than normal tide. (Dave Harp)

“Hey there, thanks for making my property worth even less.” You get these calls and emails when you make a movie that raises public awareness of climate change, rising sea levels and worsening erosion.

The collateral damage of such efforts is they don’t exactly boost housing values for those already living along the lower-lying edges of the Chesapeake.

The Bay Journal film I just finished with photographer Dave Harp and producer Sandy Cannon Brown — High Tide in Dorchester — shows how Maryland’s fourth largest county by land area could shrink to 14th (of 23) circa 2100 if we don’t get serious about mitigating climate change.

Kathy Blake of Hoopersville in lower Dorchester County, the latest “fan” who called, didn’t need our film to raise her awareness. She and her husband, John, have lost six cars to high tides in their yard in the last 15 years — “and multiple bicycles…if it’s at ground level here, sooner or later it floats away,” she told me during an interview in her yard near the Honga River.

Kathy and John grew up in the Washington suburb of Bladensburg, which received ocean-going vessels coming up the Potomac until around 1835. By 1898, a writer noted that only a canoe could still navigate to the ”port” of Bladensburg, filled in by sediment from tree clearing and poor farming practices.

When I visited their current 1890s two-story home on Hoopersville Road, it was easy to see how they fell in love with the place in 1996. Across a breathtaking sweep of saltmarsh and Bay, I could see Solomons and Calvert Cliffs, highlighted by the morning sun on the Western Shore.

“It was so peaceful, so safe and quiet, a playground for our kids,” Kathy said. Only later would the Blakes learn that they had moved to a place where the tide carries greater implications than the mere ebb and flow of water in and out of the Bay every six and a quarter hours.

Her first memorable tide seemed more nuisance than anything, a couple of inches of water across the road as she took the kids to the school bus. “This is nothing,” the bus driver told her, and all morning it kept coming, up the front steps, to the front door sill, into the living room. “Oh well, we bought the house,” she said.

Kathy has long been in the habit of moving their vehicles across the street to slightly higher ground when she knows high water’s coming, but sometimes there’s no warning.

Last February on a bitter cold morning, she came downstairs and “I saw water glistening all around…there was 6 inches in the Toyota Highlander…a total loss.”

She hauled her 5-year-old granddaughter to the bus in a canoe that day. The water didn’t make it into the house, “but it was so close I knew if a truck came by, the wave from it would swamp the living room.”

The “big tide,” the biggest in recorded history for many parts of the Chesapeake, came in 2003 with the remnants of Hurricane Isabel — the Blakes had 5 feet of water in their home and evacuated in a hurry. “I left without even a pair of clean underwear,” Kathy said.

Uninsured, they put more than $70,000 of their own money into restoring their home, this atop the nearly $30,000 they’d already put into the place.

“I stopped being emotionally attached here after Isabel, we lost so much,” Kathy said. Even now, treasured pictures are leaned up, not attached to the walls, “so I can throw ‘em in a box quick if I have to get out.”

And Kathy does want out. She called me because our High Tide film mentioned the need for governments to consider buying out homes vulnerable to rising seas and erosion.

Governments in other locations have been buying out properties for decades along floodplains of streams and rivers — it’s cheaper in the long run than setting people back up for future disasters after flooding.

They could move anywhere; Kathy’s a semi-retired grant writer and John’s a plumber working on the Western Shore, coming back on weekends. But they can’t afford to sell.

A hunt club might pay a little for their 6.5 acres, much of it saltmarsh, “but nobody else in their right mind would buy here.”

Anna Sierra, director of emergency services for Dorchester County, said officials are looking into possible federal-state grants for a “demonstration buyout” that would include the Blakes’ home and another in the Neck District west of Cambridge. The latter home might be moved to a vacant lot in Cambridge and the land used for public water access.

“But this is all very preliminary,” Sierra stressed.

The two properties are just the tip of the iceberg, not only for Dorchester County, but for the nation’s coastlines as seas are forecast to rise up to 6 feet in the next century, simultaneously threatening and devaluing properties.

Another concern for Hoopersville: The long bridge and causeway connecting the tiny community to the mainland is showing serious damage from storms and needs around $16 million in repairs — several times the amount that its construction cost in 1980. Neither state nor county road budgets have money for that.

Kathy’s plan B? “Hit the Powerball [lottery],” she said. “Or…it’s horrible to think this, but we’re insured now for flooding — the rates just went from $1,600 to $2,000 annually. If another Isabel hit, I could just take the money and leave.”

She wouldn’t go far from tidewater, she said. “I love the Bay. I just don’t love sharing my house and cars with it.”

The views expressed by columnists are not necessarily those of the Bay Journal.

Tom Horton, a Bay Journal columnist, has written many articles and books about the Chesapeake Bay, including Turning the Tide and Island Out of Time. He currently teaches writing and environmental topics at Salisbury University.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

We aim to provide a forum for fair and open dialogue.
Please use language that is accurate and respectful.
Comments may not include:

* Insults, verbal attacks or degrading statements
* Explicit or vulgar language
* Information that violates a person's right to privacy
* Advertising or solicitations
* Misrepresentation of your identity or affiliation
* Incorrect, fraudulent or misleading content
* Spam or comments that do not pertain to the posted article
We reserve the right to edit or decline comments that do follow these guidelines.