This is the sixth in a series of articles — produced by the Bay Journal and Chesapeake Quarterly, the magazine of Maryland Sea Grant — that explore the impacts of, and policies related to, sea level rise around the Bay.

The observation deck at the edge of Lake Blackwater in the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge gives visitors a view of an ecosystem on the move.

Matt Whitbeck stands at the end of this wooden walkway that stretches over an expanse of green marsh grasses, putting tourists right in the middle of a vibrant wetland. Around the deck, one can spy red-winged blackbirds, buzzing insects and the occasional jumping fish.

Whitbeck is a wildlife biologist at the Blackwater refuge, which occupies around 28,000 acres of forests, marshes and water in Dorchester County on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. Today, he’s interested in the transitions that are occurring across this landscape. Over the decades, Lake Blackwater — which occupies around 4,000 acres at the center portion of the refuge — has grown bigger and bigger, Whitbeck said. And acres and acres that were once marshland have been covered in water, killing off the plants there.

But new marshes are forming here, too. Whitbeck points to a line of sickly looking loblolly pine trees in the distance. Because of the encroaching water, the area is now too salty for them, he explained. When those trees die, though, marsh plants will grow in around them.

“You can see, essentially, the habitat transition in action. I mean, you can see that line of dying trees. You can see the marsh encroaching,” Whitbeck said. “It’s happening in front of our eyes.”

The driving force behind these transitions is sea level rise — brought on by man-made climate change and the sinking of land surfaces around the Eastern Shore. Rising waters have claimed more than 5,000 acres of marshland in the refuge since it was established in the 1930s. That’s close to half of Blackwater’s historic wetlands.

Whitbeck and others recently launched a new effort to stem the loss of marshes throughout Blackwater, which is operated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Their strategy will take advantage of the ability of marshes to spread and move — just like one can see them doing from the observation deck. The success or failure of this venture could influence how natural resource managers work to conserve wetlands across the Chesapeake for decades to come.

Rick Abend first bought property in lower Dorchester County not too far from the Blackwater refuge in 1972. It started off as a weekend getaway spot for Abend, who lived on the Maryland’s Western Shore. Now retired, the 64-year-old owns and operates a tree farm on this 106-acre plot near Madison, MD.

During his early years in lower Dorchester, Abend, who likes to hunt, mainly had his eye on the region’s abundant waterfowl. But he says that living near the refuge gave him an education in wetlands. Today, he serves as president of the nonprofit group Friends of Blackwater.

“I was looking for ducks and geese. But now I’ve just seen so much more with the egrets and herons,” Abend said. “[Blackwater] has really opened up my eyes to what other things benefit from marshes.”

There are currently around 9,000 acres of wetlands in the Blackwater refuge. These marshes are home to an array of wildlife.

But there are other benefits to having these ecosystems around, scientists say. Marshes help to improve water quality in the Chesapeake

Bay by trapping nutrients and sediments flowing from rivers toward the estuary. They can also protect shorelines from the crashing waves generated by big storms. And they are important nurseries for various commercial fish species.

But around the Bay, these natural communities are also in danger of drowning. Scientists estimate that water levels in the Chesapeake could rise by three feet or more by the end of this century. And that’s a problem for Blackwater. Under that scenario, nearly all of Blackwater’s existing marshes could be underwater by 2100.

The scale of the marsh loss here has made Blackwater into what many consider a poster child for the toll of sea level rise on the Bay. The refuge has certainly felt the effects of rising waters sooner than other wetland locations around the estuary.

One big reason is that in the 20th century, Blackwater was hit especially hard by colonies of nutria, an invasive species. The buck-toothed rodents have a voracious appetite and stripped bare whole patches of wetlands in the region until the animals were eradicated from the refuge about a decade ago.

Other Bay wetlands at risk

Despite Blackwater’s early-bird status, scientists are seeing indications that sea level rise may be taking a toll on other wetlands around the Chesapeake as well.

According to data from the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, there are currently around 187,000 acres of “irregularly flooded marsh” around the Maryland portion of the estuary. This type of saltwater marsh is common in Blackwater. The department estimates that nearly 90 percent of those wetlands could vanish by 2100 because of sea level rise.

Blackwater is “unique in a certain sense. Things happen earlier there than in the rest of the Bay,” said Court Stevenson, a wetland ecologist at the Horn Point Laboratory of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. “But I think other wetlands in the Bay are probably going down the road that Blackwater was at 50 or 60 years ago.”

Which makes it all the more important that scientists and natural resource managers discover how to help marshes survive the rising waters here.

In 2013, Whitbeck, the refuge biologist, co-wrote a report laying out a plan for securing the long-term survival of marshes in and around the Blackwater refuge. Other authors of the report, Blackwater 2100: A Strategy for Salt Marsh Persistence in an Era of Climate Change, are Erik Meyers, vice president of an Arlington, VA-based conservation group, The Conservation Fund; and David Curson, director of bird conservation for the Maryland and Washington, DC, chapter of the National Audubon Society.

To save these wetlands, Whitbeck and his colleagues proposed moving beyond traditional conservation strategies focused on protecting marshes in their current locations. The Blackwater refuge, for instance, installed a weir to reduce saltwater flow into its marshes. Instead, natural resource managers and others should work to help marshes spread to

new locations in and around the refuge, the report said.

“Things are changing, and they’re changing fast here on the refuge,” Whitbeck said. “We’ve got to figure out how to work with these changes.”

One way is to help marshes do what they have done for a long time. Sea level in the region has gradually risen for thousands of years, and geologic evidence collected from around the Bay shows that marshes have responded in two ways. They have either grown upward by collecting enough sediment and decomposed plant matter to keep pace with the rising water or have moved away from the water, farther inland.

Moving inland will likely be crucial if marshes are going to survive rising sea level. As the water rises, the lowest-lying marshes, or those closest to the Bay, will become submerged and die.

Meanwhile, the Bay will move inland to dryer and higher land. This influx of salty water will kill off forests like the lines of loblolly pines near Lake Blackwater. Marshes, in turn, will replace those forests.

“The whole process has been going on for a long, long time,” Whitbeck said. “The marshes we have here are currently riddled with old tree stumps.”

The Blackwater 2100 authors wanted to find out where the wetlands that exist today in the Blackwater refuge could flee to in the future. To do that, the team employed computer simulations based on elevation data and projections about how fast the Bay’s waters are likely to rise.

To migrate successfully, and quickly, marshes need to have access to wide open landscapes free of obstacles — obstacles like roads, towns, seawalls and even natural features like steep hills.

Ecologists and planners call such open spaces “migration corridors.” Two such corridors stuck out in the Blackwater 2100 analysis. The first, around the Nanticoke River at the east end of the refuge, would be able to hold around 2,300 acres of marshes in 2100, the authors estimated. The second, around Coursey Creek to the west, could hold around 3,600 acres.

The hope is that by identifying these corridors, the refuge and conservation groups can focus their resources on preserving habitats in these areas. Many natural resource managers around the country looking to preserve coastal marshes elsewhere have jumped on the same bandwagon. The thinking goes that you can preserve wetlands in a region simply by giving them the chance to move into open land.

Scientists say this approach could help the marshes, but it also has its limits. One of the biggest is that it’s not clear whether wetlands will be able to migrate fast enough to keep ahead of current rates of sea level rise. Marshes “can adapt and have adapted and built as sea level has risen since the last ice age,” said Andrew Baldwin, a wetland ecologist at the University of Maryland, College Park. “It’s more a question of can they deal with a higher rate of sea level rise?”

Sea rise may outstrip migration

No one has estimated how fast wetlands in Blackwater will be able to migrate as the Bay’s waters rise. The Blackwater 2100 team acknowledged in their report that marsh migration may not be able to offset the full brunt of sea level rise on the refuge.

Still, if only some marshes wind up surviving to 2100, that’s still better than none. The big challenge in protecting as many of these natural communities as possible comes down to an old question in conservation: Who owns the land?

And it’s a tricky one. The Coursey Creek migration corridor that Whitbeck’s team identified, for instance, stretches over 14,000 acres. Today, only 3,182 acres of that land are protected from development in some fashion, although not all of these acres would make good marsh habitat. The rest is mostly working farmland, where marshes may not be welcome.

To address potential conflicts like these, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources is spearheading an effort to protect marsh habitat into the future. The goal is to preserve land in the most important migration corridors for marshes along Maryland’s coastline so that if wetlands need to migrate, they will face fewer obstacles. One of the key tools in this program will be formal agreements called conservation easements.

Under such easements, property owners — often farmers — volunteer to limit the amount of development that can occur on their land. In return for these and other conservation actions, the state pays the landowners a lump sum, usually equal to about 40–60 percent of the market value of their property. Proponents of conservation easements argue that they’re a win-win: Farmers can continue to work their land, while the state conserves upland areas to which marshes may be able to migrate in the future as sea level rises.

So far, the department has purchased only one easement, on a 221-acre property in lower Dorchester County. But other groups, including The Conservation Fund, have secured a large number of conservation easements around the Blackwater refuge. In the Coursey Creek migration corridor, there are around 812 acres of privately owned land under easements. And there are many more in the Nanticoke corridor: Around 2,300 acres of land are protected by these agreements.

That’s still shy of the roughly 5,000 acres that the Blackwater 2100 authors highlighted as necessary to support future marsh habitat. The Conservation Fund, for its part, is pursuing opportunities to increase those numbers by securing conservation easements and supporting other conservation methods, said Meyers, the group’s vice president.

Because these efforts are just beginning, it’s not clear how popular they will be with Marylanders on the Eastern Shore and elsewhere. At the moment, residents of lower Dorchester County are happy to have the Blackwater refuge around, said Nancy Hastings. She’s a resident of the town of Church Creek and heads up a local volunteer effort called the South Dorchester Good Neighbor Project.

Hastings said that a large number of her neighbors like living in Dorchester for the same reason that wetland plants and wildlife do: There’s plenty of room and not that many people. The big refuge in the heart of the region helps to keep that way of life from disappearing, she said. Lower Dorchester residents “don’t want building. They don’t want development,” Hastings said. “Blackwater is a way of keeping

things rural.”

But Dorchester residents like Rick Abend are regularly reminded of the Bay’s encroachment on the marsh and surrounding land. On the east end of the farmer’s property, which is by the water, new trees that he planted haven’t grown well — victims of the saltwater that is creeping farther and farther inland.

When it comes to Abend’s crop, “I imagine I will cut it before the saltwater gets it…but that’s going to be years from now,” he said. “I’ve got plenty of time for a couple more harvests.”