Bay Journal

Task force looking for ways to control invasive blue catfish

Action needed to prevent irreversible harm to Bay’s ecosystem.

  • By Karl Blankenship on September 03, 2014
  • Comments are closed for this article.
Maryland DNR biologist Branson Williams has to use an extra ruler to measure a blue catfish too big for the standard measuring board. The fish, collected in the Potomac River near Fort Washington, MD, was 44 inches long. (Dave Harp) Maryland DNR biologists Branson Williams, left, and Tim Groves handle two large blue catfish near the Woodrow Wilson bridge on the Potomac River. The fish were collected using an electroshocking rig.  (Dave Harp) Maryland DNR biologist Branson Williams brings in a blue catfish  that was electroshocked during a survey of  the Potomac River. (Dave Harp)

People may not learn to love blue catfish in the Chesapeake Bay, but perhaps they will learn to love them on their plate.

A draft report from a task force that spent more than a year looking for ways to deal with the large, voracious — and rapidly expanding — blue catfish population acknowledges that the invasive species has likely become a permanent resident of the Bay, and says action is needed to prevent “irreversible” harm to the ecosystem.

Chief among its recommendations is an expanded commercial fishery that might control the population and create a new product for watermen.

The task force’s draft report recommends a range of actions, such as identifying sensitive areas, such as high-quality spawning grounds, where extra efforts against the predators might protect high priority species such as shad.

It questioned whether states should continue to promote catfish trophy fisheries, and said efforts should be ramped up to warn the public about the ecological impacts of invasive catfish and dissuade anglers from moving them into new areas.

The report was completed by the Invasive Catfish Task Force — a group of state, federal and university biologists assembled by the state-federal Bay Program’s Sustainable Fisheries Goal Implementation Team to identify actions to control blue and flathead catfish, neither of which are Bay watershed natives.

Most of the report’s focus is on blue catfish, which tolerate moderate salinities and are more numerous and widespread in tidal Bay tributaries. Flatheads are more restricted to freshwater areas.

Nonetheless, flatheads — which are already the most abundant predator in the Susquehanna River — are likely to get more management attention in the future, said Bruce Vogt, acting deputy director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Chesapeake Bay Office, and task force chair. “There is already pretty significant concern about flatheads in Maryland and Pennsylvania,” Vogt said.

The report will likely be updated as new information is gained. The report and its recommendations are now under review by the Bay Program’s Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee, which could result in some changes later this year.

The report warns that if left unchecked, invasive catfish could cause substantial ecological and economic harm to the Bay.

Recent studies suggest that growing numbers of blue catfish could threaten efforts to restore species such as river herring and shad, and they may also eat substantial numbers of economically important blue crabs. They could also outcompete native white catfish in some areas, and threaten native mussel populations.

They have become so numerous in some places that they interfere with watermen targeting other species, such as striped bass.

“The expanding range and increasing populations, particularly of blue catfish, have resource managers concerned that without management intervention, the damage to Chesapeake Bay resources may be irreversible,” the task force report said.

Blue catfish were introduced into Virginia Bay tributaries by state biologists beginning in the early 1970s in an effort to boost the recreational freshwater fisheries — a common practice at the time.

Over the last decade, their population has increased dramatically and spread to most tributaries on the Western Shore. They have begun turning up in Eastern Shore rivers as well.

Although they generally avoid salinities higher than 14 parts per thousand, years with high river flows and reduced salinities allow them to enter new areas. In addition, biologists believe anglers have intentionally introduced blue catfish into some tributaries because they want more opportunities to catch large fish.

In parts of the James River, blue catfish are thought to be the most abundant fish, and their numbers are rapidly growing in other systems, such as the Potomac. They are top predators, and will eat most other fish — and shellfish — in the rivers. And, they can reach huge sizes — the Virginia tidal record is 102 pounds.

“In the aquatic system, there is nothing that gets bigger than them — unless it’s another blue catfish,” Vogt said. The task force report warns that blue catfish could double their current range in the Bay watershed.

It noted that eradication of an invasive species is “rarely feasible or cost-effective once a species has become widely dispersed in an open aquatic system like Chesapeake Bay.” As a result, the report focused its recommendations on actions that would help control the population and limit its expansion.

The primary control method it proposes is to promote a commercial blue catfish fishery that would give watermen a new product to market while removing invasive fish. While this is already under way, the report says it may require new investments, such as new or expanded processing facilities, to maximize harvest.

Promoting a fishery, though, tacitly acknowledges that the goal is not to rid the Bay of an invasive fish, but to manage it, especially if fishermen begin buying gear to target catfish, and seafood processors invest in new facilities to handle a wave of new fish.

“Once you open a fishery like that, you are probably in it for the long haul,” Vogt said. “Then the challenge is to come up with a framework that gets fishing pressure where we are reducing the ecological impact, but also sustains this new economy that has developed around the catfish. That’s a tough one.”

In fact, overfishing the population could cause problems. If the catfish were to become too hard to catch, fishing pressure would drop — and the population could mushroom again.

“If you are using a commercial fishery as a way to manage a thing like blue catfish, you don’t want the fishery to crash,” said Matt Ogburn, a researcher with the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center who works with blue catfish and is a member of the task force.

The bigger immediate issue, though, is whether a fishery can actually make a dent in the booming population. That will depend in large part on whether markets can be grown to increase demand. Fishery agencies have been promoting catfish, and a nonprofit group, the Wide Net Project, is also working to increase demand for the fish, including touting it as a healthy food to hunger-relief organizations.

While consumer demand is growing, Wendy Stuart, co-founder of Wide Net, said markets for blue catfish ultimately need to be developed beyond the Bay watershed to stimulate enough fishing demand to curb the population.

The group recently reached an agreement with a Boston-based processor to begin marketing blue catfish from the Bay. “Local food is good, but it doesn’t always solve the problem,” Stuart said.

The Bay region isn’t alone in this approach. A fishery for lionfish is being promoted in the Gulf of Mexico to reduce impacts from that invasive fish. “Harvest pressure is making a difference in that fishery,” said Stephen Vilnit, fisheries marketing director with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and a member of the task force.

“You may not be able to catch the last fish, but you might be able to knock them to a level where they’re not having the huge ecological impact they are currently having,” Vilnit said.

In addition to promoting a commercial fishery, the report suggests that states consider incentives that would increase harvests, such as allowing boat captains to use electrofishing gear that targets blue catfish, which are stunned by a specific frequency that doesn’t affect other fish. Electrofishing has proven to be a highly effective way to collect them. But more studies would be needed to assess the feasibility of commercial electrofishing and potential safety concerns.

The report also calls for states to identify areas with populations of native species that could be threatened by blue catfish and to target those areas for additional removal efforts, possibly by sending out crews with electrofishing gear.

Such areas might include spawning areas for shad, river herring and other anadromous fish species, as well as habitats for shellfish and species with important ecological value.

While blue catfish likely wouldn’t be eradicated from those areas, the goal would be to keep numbers low so they would not pose a substantial threat to native species.

Protecting targeted areas could prove challenging. Ogburn has been tracking blue catfish movements in the Patuxent River, and has found they are highly mobile and could quickly repopulate areas from which they are removed.

“If you want to remove blue catfish from Jug Bay, you would essentially have to remove blue catfish from the entire Patuxent River,” Ogburn said.

Vogt agreed that “it probably won’t work everywhere,” but said task force members did not want to write off all areas. “People thought it might make sense to try in a few places but we have to be smart about what places we choose,” he said.

In a possiby controversial recommendation, the task force said the benefits of removing dams should be weighed against the potential that such action could open the door for catfish to reach new areas. For instance, a new fishway at Bosher’s Dam outside Richmond allowed blue catfish to colonize the James River as far as Columbia, about 50 miles upstream.

Removing dams and building fish passages to reopen historic habitat used by shad, river herring and eels has been a major Bay Program priority.

In reality, Vogt said he was skeptical that concerns over blue catfish would halt any dam removals or new fish passages. “A lot of people told us that while we are looking at a dam as a barrier, it most likely is not — because people have likely already caught and moved catfish to places on the other side of the barrier,” he said.

The task force recommended that current state fishing policies and regulations be reviewed to identify those that may promote the persistence and expansion of invasive catfish populations, such as trophy fisheries, though the report said both Virginia and Maryland officials seemed to oppose that action in the James or Potomac rivers.

“Managers should discuss the risks associated with maintenance of trophy fisheries,” the report said. “This perpetuates the maintenance of large individuals in the environment for long periods of time.”

Finally, it said improved public education is needed to inform anglers and others about the risks blue catfish pose. That could help discourage anglers from moving fish into new areas, and highlight the concerns to the general public. The public is less informed about blue catfish than snakeheads — the headline grabbing “frankenfish” that invaded the Potomac River a decade ago — even though catfish likely pose a greater threat, Vogt said.

That’s starting to change, as Maryland, supported by the Bay Program, began posting warning signs about catfish earlier this year, and agencies are beginning to post more information on their websites. Still, Vogt said, “awareness is not at the level of the snakehead.”

Information about blue and flathead catfish is available at www.chesapeakebay.noaa.gov/fish-facts/invasive-catfish.

About Karl Blankenship

Karl Blankenship is editor of the Bay Journal and executive director of Chesapeake Media Service. He has served as editor of the Bay Journal since its inception in 1991. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Read more articles by Karl Blankenship

Comments

By submitting a comment, you are consenting to these Rules of Conduct. Thank you for your civil participation. Please note: reader comments do not represent the position of Chesapeake Media Service.

Paul on February 02, 2015:

Should allow me to come and fish as many as I can catch to fill my freezer to eat.


William Blankenship on February 02, 2015:

There is a large misconseption here. Catfish are not an invasive species, they are actually a sought after species that are becoming more popular everyday by novice and at a professional level. There are organizations all over the country working to preserve the quality of these fish. I can understand population control, but a lot of states have put size limits to enhance the quality of these majestic beast of the deep.Your fishery is becoming a popular destination for thousands of anglers across the country, so please take this in to consideration before you take action,and preserve the spiecies for generations to come. Thank you, William Blankenship


Glenn Flowers on February 03, 2015:

Its time to put an end to this task force before they do more harm than good


Mike Seal on February 03, 2015:

I totally agree with what William Blankenship had to say. Plus I feel these catfish are already well established and are co existing fine with all the native species. The Potomac river and the James river seems balanced with healthy fish populations of all species and trophy sized fish of each specie. Nothing seems to be negatively impacted. As mentioned, these catfish have been there now for many years. No reason to ruin a growing in popularity fishery that brings tons of money to both Virginia and Maryland.


Paul Rodriguez on February 03, 2015:

In no way do I believe that this is an invasive species. It has gained popularity as being a top game fish in Texas along with yellow cats. We need to do everything possible to preserver this wonderful creature for our kids and there kids.


Lifelong Catfisherman on February 03, 2015:

The James River and other tidal rivers are some of the absolute best blue cat fisheries in the world. There are numerous guide services that help put their clients on giant fish and thousands of anglers across the US who dream of fishing these waters. Please recognize the value in what it has now become and don't try to take away these giant fish. Commercial fishing has destroyed trophy catfish populations in the Midwest and in the south where they are native. Don't let this happen in these tidal rivers. If the decision is made to thin the numbers of these fish please at least put measures in place to protect trophy sized fish that offer no food value.


Derrick on February 03, 2015:

Leave our catfish alone...I'm sick of state officials not considering catfish a game fish..I live in PA i wish my state would have regulations on cats...stop calling them invasive fish.


Craig on February 03, 2015:

Catfish are not a invasive species, take a look at the tournament trails around the United States! The sport is spreading like crazy use it for an avenue!!! $$$$$


Steve Shaffer on February 03, 2015:

The pursuit of blue and flathead catfish by anglers can bring mega dollars to your state, set regulation, make catfish a game fish, protect blue and flathead catfish!


Brent on February 03, 2015:

How can you consider a species invasive when they were introduced on purpose? Its your own fault that blues and flatheads are eating the native species. You should've talked to the people that fish for them to have an idea on their habits.


Bill Mourar III on February 04, 2015:

This majestic fish being electro-fished is absurd as introducing asiatic carp. It is a prized fish as well as flathead and will thin out sick and weak fish populations so not only will other species thrive but more recors sized fish caught not to mention the large blue beasts themselves. I say bring them to my home state of PA so I can catch them as well as flatheads!


Bryan Heimann on February 04, 2015:

Management is good, eradication is bad. Blue catfish are excellent sport fish, and they make good table fare. If commercial fishing for the blues is allowed, it must be regulated just like every other species. They should be viewed as an asset, not a detrimental invasive species.


Todd on February 04, 2015:

This is the most ridiculous thing I've read all week. Catfish are not invasive. They are native species and control the invasive species, such as carp and zebra mussels that are not native and are invasive. Watch what happens to those numbers as you remove their natural predator.


jim frazee on February 04, 2015:

>>>Blue catfish were introduced into Virginia Bay tributaries by state biologists beginning in the early 1970s in an effort to boost the recreational freshwater fisheries <<< Another great move (sarcasm intended) by the management folk. Up here in New Jersey, all the "management folk" have accomplished is to totally gut the recreational fishing industry. Good job! (sarcasm intended) JimF from Sewell


William Green on February 04, 2015:

don't want them there - transport them to Texas - we'll gladly take them


Catfish Andy Brennan on February 04, 2015:

First of all, Mr. Blankenship, have you ever fished for blues? I'm going to attempt to keep this short. When I read your article, I'm extremely troubled by the shortsightedness, futility, and mindless waste of a magnificent sportfish. For the most part, the introduction of blue catfish to the tidal rivers in your area were deliberate on the part of Virginia's DNR. Why didn't they see this coming? To now warrant the demise and eradication of these once-desired fish will prove ultimately a mistake. I hope that you have an appreciation for the phenomenal blue cat fisheries that your states have achieved. The growth rates of these tidal river fish are nearly unattainable in most other bodies of water (including many on their native range). News of the blue cats' propensity to grow to such large dimensions so quickly has spread like wildfire amongst sportfishermen. I know of numerous catfish anglers from my area (the upper Midwest) who make at least one trip to the James River to have a shot at big blue catfish. I would venture to say that there are many more anglers who travel much further distances to ply the tidal rivers for the trophy blue cats of which you have plenty. Don't forsake the blue cat guides in your area who are already making a living by respectfully fishing for what I consider to be an invaluable resource, one that I would love to have swimming in my home waters. Please understand my concern. Blue cats fulfill a vital niche in the ecosystems they inhabit. Try to draw back their numbers, and you may find yourselves in the wealth of many other "less desirable" species, those whose numbers blue cats are already keeping in check. I respect your views and concerns, but you need to hear out the voices of people like me. I keep going back to the fact that the blue catfish with which you all now claim to be plagued are swimming in your waters because the of deliberate, authorized introductions on the part of your state's wildlife officials. Learn to embrace the gem of a fishery that has developed in your waters. You have no idea how good you have it.


Comments are now closed for this article. Comments are accepted for 60 days after publication.

Chesapeake Film Festival
Saturday, Oct. 28, 2017
Waterfowl Festival 2017
Ecotone
Valliant and Associates
Ernst Seed
EQR: Environmental Quality Resources
Clydes Sports Shop

Copyright ©2017 Bay Journal / Bay Journal Media / Advertise with Us

Terms of use | Privacy Policy